Sopwith Triplane Typhoon

Boulton and Paul P.6 and P.9

For a description of the format and data included in Production Tables, see here.

Type Description and Production Data

P.6 P.9
Production Summary
P.6
Two seat biplane full-scale experimental aircraft to examine different aerofoil sections. It was a wood and fabric single-bay biplane, its wings being without stagger or sweep, with a constant chord of 5 ft on both wings. The wings were built of spruce spars and ribs, with a spruce leading edge and an ash trailing edge. The ailerons were identical on upper and lower wings. The fuselage was flat sided with a rounded top, rather similar in construction to that of the Camel and using many Camel parts. The fin and horn balanced rudder together were almost circular and the tailplane was braced to the fin. The large interplane gap put the upper wing well above the fuselage with the centre section braced to front and rear spars by outward sloping struts from the upper longerons. The pilot's cockpit was under the trailing edge, where there was a cut-out for visibility and the passenger sat in a separate cockpit under the wing. The engine was partly enclosed in a metal cowling, with the cylinder heads protruding as it was air-cooled. There was a simple single axle undercarriage and tail skid. One 90 h.p. RAF 1a powerplant driving a four-blade propeller.

P.6 Specification
Span Length Height Wing Area Empty Wt Max AUW Cruise Speed Maximum Speed Endurance Service Ceiling
25 ft 19 ft 8 ft 235 sq ft 1100 lb 1725 lb 85 mph/ 74 kn 103 mph/ 90 kn 2hr 20min
7.62 m 5.79 m 2.44 m 21.83 m2 499 kg 782 kg 137 km/h 166 km/h

Production Details
C/n Initial
Registration
Notes
 1 aircraft built by the Aircraft Department of Boulton and Paul Ltd, Mousehold, Norwich, Norfolk. First flew late 1918.
 P.6/1  K-120 / G-EACJ  Originally X.25. Retained by Boulton and Paul Ltd.
Total Production  1

P.9
Two seat touring biplane, a larger version of the P.6, 6ft longer with a 2ft 6in increase in span, though the wings remained single-bay. They were built in five sections, three for the upper and two for the lower which were attached directly to the lower fuselage longerons. The upper wing was carried on wooden N interplane struts and the centre section was supported above the fuselage by two struts each side. Ailerons were fitted on both top and bottom wings. The undercarriage was a conventional V-type with an elastic-sprung tubular axle. The same tail unit and centre fuselage section were used, but both the wing chord and gap were increased by 6 inches to 5 ft 6 in each. The fuselage was a simple wire-braced box-girder but the top longerons were not horizontal. They sloped up 10 deg so that the tailplane was above the line of thrust. The fuel tankage was increased by nearly 4 gal to 24 imp gal. The engine was mounted directly on the upper longerons, and was partially enclosed by a cowling cum air-scoop. Long exhaust pipes discharged behind the rear cockpit.
After the first aircraft, the definitive production P.9s had slight changes. The rudder horn-balance and the tail incidence gear were both altered. The tailplane incidence could be altered by means of a lug with three holes, one or other of which received a bolt attaching it to a bracket on the rear spar. Extra centre-section struts were installed, the centre section being supported above the fuselage on metal tube N struts, the vertical members having streamlined fairings. A luggage space was created behind the two seats, and two hemispherical suitcases were specially made to fit the resulting compartment, which was covered by a metal cowling with quick release catches. The fabric covering of the fuselage could easily be removed by undoing the lacing by which it was fixed. The cockpit decking and engine section were covered in three-ply. Full dual controls were fitted so that the aircraft could be used as a trainer, the control column in the front cockpit being removable. Instruments and engine controls were provided in both cockpits, except for the engine revolution indicator which was mounted in a streamlined casing outside the forward fuselage on the port side where it was visible from both cockpits. Wicker-work seats were provided in both cockpits, which were comfortable and roomy. One 90 h.p. RAF 1a powerplant driving a 9 ft 3 in diameter four-blade propeller.

P.9 Specification
Span Length Height Wing Area Empty Wt Max AUW Cruise Speed Maximum Speed Range Service Ceiling
27 ft 6 in 25 ft 10 ft 323 sq ft 1244 lb 1770 lb 85 mph/ 74 kn 104 mph/ 90 kn 300 mi 14000 ft
8.38 m 7.62 m 3.05 m 30.01 m2 564 kg 803 kg 137 km/h 167 km/h 483 km 4267 m

Production Details
C/n Initial
Registration
Notes
 8 aircraft built by the Aircraft Department of Boulton and Paul Ltd, Mousehold, Norwich, Norfolk. Built between May 1919 and September 1922.
 P9/1  none  To Australia mid 1919 by Lt. Long, became G-AUDB. To Victorian Flying Services.
 P9/2  G-EAPD  Retained by Boulton and Paul Ltd as demonstrator.
 P9/3  G-AUBT  To Life Assurance Co. of Australia, Melbourne, via distributor Aviation Ltd.
 P9/4  G-EASJ  To Brig. J.G. weir, Renfrew. To John Wilkinson of Young's Field, Cape Towrn in 1929 as G-UAAM, later ZS-AAM.
 P9/5  G-AUCT  To F.J.Barnes, Hamilton, Victoria in Apr 1922, via distributor Aviation Ltd. Crashed and regn cancelled 27 Jun 1922; reportedly rebuilt as the Jones Wonga
 Monoplane.
 P9/6  G-EAWS  Retained by Boulton and Paul Ltd as demonstrator. Rebuilt in 1930 by Ernest 'Tom' Worsell of Sevenoaks with a 10 h.p. Singer water-cooled powerplant.
 P9/7  G-AUCP  To R.S. Falkiner, Groongal NSW, in February 1920, via distributor Aviation Ltd.
 P9/8  G-EBEQ  Initially retained by Boulton and Paul Ltd as demonstrator, to Frank Soden 10 September 1926. Crashed in Switzerland in 1929 and rebuilt as CH-259.
Total Production  8

Production Summary

All Aircraft By Type
Type Built New Conv Canc'd Total
 P.6 1 1
 P.9 8 8
9 (0) 0

Notes

  1. Per summary details given in AB Archive [3], both P.9/1 and P.9/2 were initially registered G-EAPD. Were they in fact the same aircraft, was the registration applied twice or was it simply never carried by P.9/1 and reused on P.9/2 after the former was exported?
  2. Alec Brew [2] states that "it was not the company policy to allocate c/ns and that when Long's aircraft had to be registered in Australia after June 1921 it was retrospectively given c/n P.9.1 as it was the first built."

Production References

  1. Air Britain Archive 2002/1, (Air-Britain Publications)
  2. Air Britain Archive 2002/2, (Air-Britain Publications)
  3. Air Britain Archive 2002/4, (Air-Britain Publications)

Page Revision History

Revised at Version 2.0.0
  • Added Type Description and Specification details.